February 14, 2007
May 7, 2008

Now everyone feels his or her actions and reactions are of equal importance. And since all actions and reactions are parallel then a hierarchy can’t exist. Everyone’s lost perspective. Their vision is now linear. Importance should be based on function and necessity or at least on merit and deed. Now it’s based on loudness and insistence. Pity. The squeaky wheel did get the grease. I’ve always maintained it should just be replaced.
February 15, 2007
May 6, 2008
You know, I don’t understand something. Why do people require other people to keep the Ten Commandments but don’t keep them themselves? Why do they hold strangers to standards they themselves don’t attain? Why do they imprison people for stealing yet eat unpurchased grapes in the produce aisle? I find it difficult enough to stand erect beside a yardstick. I don’t have time to measure everyone else along my way.
I started this post with a pithy story about card games and how opponents make each other keep the rules. And as I typed it I just grew more angry and less in the mood to muse. So I’ll dispense with the meandering. I don’t understand opposition to gay marriage. Why does anyone care or feel they have the right to decide how others live their lives, choose their partners, or share their emotions? I see this entire issue as very uncomplicated.
1. If you are against gay marriage, then don’t marry someone of your same sex.
2. If you are against gay people, then don’t have sex with someone of your same sex.
3. If you feel that gay marriage is against your religion, then remember that word “your.”
4. If you feel gay marriage is against American values, then you’ve forgotten what being American actually means. As Americans we accept people who believe differently than we do. That’s why we aren’t extremists. And that’s why the forefathers sought refuge in this country. It’s simple civicism.
God gave everyone free will. Exercise your will as you will. But that doesn’t mean everyone should be willing to bend to your will just because you will it.
Look - gay marriage is a civil action. They want to be legally recognized. It’s a question of legality and civility. And as April 15 rapidly approaches, you’d better inform them quickly if they aren’t entitled to full citizenship and fundamental federal rights and protections because I think it would be enormously unjust to make them pay taxes when they are unable to experience and enjoy the same rights and responsibilities and freedoms that other taxpayers are entitled to enjoy.
I’m a baptized Roman Catholic who tries to keep the Ten Commandments and adhere to the fundamental teachings of The Church with every fiber of my being. And I absolutely and without reservation affirm all the canonical structures of The Church. I believe that Holy Matrimony is a Sacrament. I believe the fundamental rule of The Church concerning Holy Matrimony. The Church teaches that a valid marriage is a Sacrament between two baptized Roman Catholics in the state of Grace. The Church teaches that a marriage between a Catholic and a protestant is a “mixed marriage” and is forbidden by The Church. And those marriages are only allowed when the couple receives a dispensation.
I believe that. Whether I have your concurrence is not my concern. I don’t require your consent. Choose your beliefs. Participate wherever you feel comfortable. Pick and choose or select and dismiss. Wed or not. I don’t care if you commit to female, fowl, fellow, f
or now or forever. It’s of no consequence to me. And my beliefs should be of no consequence to you.
And don’t email me some sort of passage or pamphlet that explains that I’m wrong. I don’t care if you think I’m wrong. I need neither condemnation nor claque.
And don’t send me some sort of email that says you knew of some priest somewhere who somehow said my beliefs were somewhat antiquated. Priests don’t give Sacraments. God does. No one knows when a man or woman walks up to that altar whether of not Sanctifying Grace is applied to his or her soul. Only God knows that. No one knows whether a child is Baptized or a Host is Consecrated or a sin is Absolved or a marriage is Sanctified but God. A priest lives in the Sacrament of Holy Orders. A priest is the outward sign that the Sacrament is present. Therefore the priest is a sacramental. A priest is not a Sacrament. Priesthood is the Sacrament.
Now here’s my point. Lutherans will say that I am wrong. Baptists will too. Muslims, Buddhists, hell - other Catholics will decry. So feel free to add anyone to this list. No one is asking that all religions recognize all marriages. And that’s why gays should be allowed to marry. As a nation we will never agree on the fundamental attributes of a spiritually binding marriage. It has been a question before the earth for centuries. It has divided churches. It has divided nations. It has divided families. It has divided souls from salvation.
Gay marriage should be legal in the United States of America. It is not a question of sanctification. It is a question of legalization. It is an issue about civil rights. It is a movement about having the right to be treated with civility. I don’t want the Congress of the United States to decide and discern the attributes of a marriage. We’ve given them the right to cast ballots. Jesus Christ, let’s not give them the right to cast stones. Let God decide who’s sanctified.
April 07, 2007
© 2007-2008 Mark R Trost
May 5, 2008

I saw his scene.
I see his seen.
He sees I see.
He sees I see his saw.
I see.
See.
See.
© 2007-2008 Mark R Trost
May 5, 2008
I have an admission to make. And although I don’t need to wear shades over my eyes or a blue bar over my face, it is something that is relatively unexpected and uncommon. I’ve never participated in anything regarding science fiction. I’ve never seen any of the Star Wars films. I’ve never watched an episode of the original Star Trek show in its entirety.
I’ve never bought a science fiction novel. I have seen the film Barbarella but that’s because Jane Fonda had her day and every man of a certain age saw it. And I figure I’m nearly unique in the fact that the only action figures I owned were army soldiers, a GI Joe, and the Johnny West doll that was actually a cowboy.
As an aside, I’ve yet to see the film Titanic. Um … watching people drown didn’t seem like a “let’s-snack-on-goobers-and-popcorn” kind of moment. I’ve never read a Harry Potter book. Ok - and why would I? A 44-year-old man reading a book (it’s not a novel. Jesus get some standards) about a boy wizard is creepy. And the only hobbit I’ve had in my home is a brochure for a local travel agency. Science fiction … or as I refer to it science friction … rubs against the grains of my intelligence. And if you want to engage in a fantasy life - imagine living things with limbs. Characters with squishy tentacles or octopodic appendages are just frighteningly odd. Or rent Barbarella - I’m saying, the woman had her day.
Now armed with this knowledge, I perused the article about a potentially habitable planet with skepticism and derision. Ok; I scoffed. I scoffed because I think the aspect of the accumulation of information that interests me is how we process the information so that it’s accessible and it’s applicable. It seems we have to equate a new notion with a previous position so that we can comprehend it. And if those are the ground rules, then I’m willing to weigh in.
The notion that creatures exist on other planets seems preposterous when you consider it from the previous notions of existence: evolution and creation. If you want me to believe the big bang theory that through the
happenstance of explosion we came into existence, and through the processes of mutation and adaptation we changed and improved to continue our existence, then when that bang occurred - it must have affected other planets as well.
Where is the evidence of their existence? You can see our filth from space. We’ve littered the atmosphere with enough trash and pollution to provide a map to our galaxy. Hell, even Hansel and Gretel would be proud. And don’t tell me this whole UFO crap. You know what? Come very close to the screen. Elvis is dead. So unless these other life forms have evolved from a particularly inept form of life - they are goddamned slow to make their presence known. America’s only been a country a snippet over 200 years and by God the world knows us and abhors our existence. So, did the higher life forms just evolve on earth? Don’t you think that’s awfully egotistical?
The aspect of the big bang theory that I find the most entertaining and enlightening is the bang up job these scientists have done passing this bullshit off as truth. And to those who believe it … I say: Go for it. I don’t care whether you believe it or not. It’s not in the realm of my reasoning. Every six year old knows a rabbit can’t carry a basket; they just suspend their disbelief because they want candy. And although I’ve met many a man who seemed the beast, I’ve enough pride to at least adopt the notion I was created in the likeness and image of a Deity. You want to claim parentage from an ass-scratcher swinging from a tree - take the
snaps. It’s your baby book. Mutation and adaptation have moments of validity. Evolution from a big bang sounds like an explanation for a pregnancy after a beer bust.
The reason I doubt the existence of life on other planets is because I believe in creationism and as a Roman Catholic I believe in the Holy Trinity. And because I accept the fact of the existence of Christ and His action of becoming man, I see the Crucifixion as an action that hasn’t an equal. Should humans (or their equivalent) exist … and taking into account the divine justice of God The Father, I think an equivalence of original sin would have to exist in all existences. It wouldn’t seem just that earth is somehow more difficult or that human beings have a more difficult time to attain salvation. So, redemption would be necessary in all existences.
I think the notion that the Crucifixion or a similar action of redemption would have to exist in all existences … would somehow demean or even lessen the action. And if the action has an equivalent action in another existence, then the action would be less of an action. If two equivalent acts exist then neither has superiority.
This would mean that the Crucifixion was not the ultimate act of redemption; it was just an action of redemption. And I’m not prepared to render the action of God as less than it was.
It’s a leap of faith to believe in God. I don’t understand those who will believe anything instead of something. But find your own way. Choose you own path. And I’ll choose mine. I think of God as the bread of life. And I’ll take any crumbs I can find. I found my path. I see the crumbs left by Saint Augustine, Saint Francis of Assisi, and Saint Thomas Aquinas to guide. They furrowed a path. Their path has two thousand years of tread. Their words and deeds are the signposts I try to follow. And I don’t need to furrow my brow and speculate on their existence. God has made their presence known.
May 4, 2007
May 5, 2008
I did not learn at my Mother’s knee; I learned at my Mother’s side. She taught as she prayed, and as she loved, and as she worked, and as she served. I won’t blog about that. Some things I don’t wish to put into words. Some memories are my treasures.
Sister Genevieve Marie taught me the love of vocation and the discipline of obedience. When a boy is queried about what he’ll be when he grows up, he usually answers which route with a rote: fireman, policeman, or athlete. I did not. When quizzed, I always answered “a priest.” Sister Genevieve Marie fostered the seed but she did not plant it. As a child of eight, I began to diligently acquire the knowledge of The Church. I read the rules. I studied the structure. I amassed the grace.
At the age of 13, I decided that I wanted to pursue my passion in a minor seminary. I asked my parents for their permission. They denied my petition. They encouraged my vocation but wouldn’t allow me to encroach on my childhood. They knew I was too young and they insisted I wait until I graduated from high school. I thought they were so wrong. Now I know they were so right. I remember I stood at the dining room table and I screamed, “God knows I’m going to be a priest. And I know I’m going to be a priest. You can’t stop me.” Nothing screams youth like breaking the fourth commandment in defense of what you believe.
I went to a public high school and I maintained a private faith. I didn’t date much in high school; I didn’t see the point. I didn’t participate in athleticism; I saw the sin of competition. And so I waited. I waited and I watched.
There’s a requirement to enlightenment. There’s a cost. For those who can see what others overlook, or understand what others ignore, or acquire what others leave behind, there is a responsibility to bear a true witness to the actions of God. It meant I had to observe when I wanted to participate. It meant I had to educate when I only wanted to experience. It meant the spiritual took precedence over the physical and the philosophical took antecedence over the carnal. Enlightenment carries a price tag. And although zealousness can assume part of the cost, it’s just a fraction of the price. The rest of the fees can be fractionated into factions of loneliness or solitude or ostracism. My Mother taught me, “When you stand Mark, never look to see who is behind you. When you stand, you stand alone.”
I entered a seminary as a freshman in college. It was the first time I was surrounded by men who thought as I thought and conspired toward the same aspirations. I embraced the notions of community and agape. I was a young man from a public high school who rarely dated and never played - the notion of the like-minded was attractive. I enjoyed the fraternity. I coveted the exchange of ideas.
One may assume that the like-minded rarely disagree, but the parallelism
of the goal does not mean the paths toward its attainment share collateral concepts. There were those who were traditional and there were those who were liberal. There were those who were indoctrinated. There were those who believed in the induction of socialism. They all clashed and cliqued. The structure wasn’t what I anticipated. The dogma disagreed with my doctrine. And the seeds of my faith disseminated within the walls of the seminary. The foundation of my faith crumbled and dusted my shoes. I could fight or flee; I cowered and fled. It was not what I expected it to be.
But how could it be? I had ten years of romanticism and yearning wrapped into an ideal. And then I saw my expectations weren’t real. And I removed the rose-colored glasses from my eyes. My vision was blurred by my tears. I took no vow of poverty or obedience. I vowed to never see again. I vowed to be blind to responsibility. I had been blindsided. And I got off my knees and I walked away from the sun. There is no light in darkness. And night holds no vision.
Recently I told a friend about how I burnt to be blue in my youth. I had defined that sentence as burning both ends to be blue as in a code blue. And I thought about that. No; that’s not true. I burnt to be blind. If ever a day should pass when they gather around to gossip of my days, most they’ll say will be true. I’m not proud of what I did. I did not fail in my faults. I could have vaults for my faults. I lived years without reflection and recompense.
Yet I continually felt remorse. I could shave without reflection; I could wound without reimbursement. But the aspect of closing one’s eyes we rarely consider is that light and shadows still remain behind the lashes. We can lash out but we can’t put a lid on it even when we try. The pupils can still learn. Revelation can offer insight within the blink of an eye. I knew what I was. I knew what I chose. I learned that when I closed my eyes, I stumbled. I fell. I scraped. I wounded my shins. And I bruised until I grew numb. And then I didn’t care if I saw. I thought it wouldn’t matter to me. No matter what I sought, I was brought to my knees. So I opened my eyes. And I saw what I had done. And I saw what I had failed to do. And I had insight into incite. I vowed to make amends. I am not the man I should have been but I’m trying to become the man that I should be.
I sat in the hall the other day at the hospital and I watched as a young man pushed his younger brother in a wheelchair. Both of the men were in their middle teens. As they waited for the elevator, the man who pushed bent at the waist and kissed the head of his companion in the chair. The act was so tender and my heart was so touched. I witnessed the fraternity of humanity. And I thanked God that He showed me the sight.
May 12, 2007
May 5, 2008
I know I don’t want to live a life without an examination of conscience. I like to keep tabs on how I’m doing. I don’t want to turn my cheek and not confront the reality of life. I want to face the reality of my life and I want to face the reality of yours. I don’t want to meet people and not consider their idiosyncrasies that illuminate their humanity and demonstrate their uniqueness. It’s in those moments of the examination of human behavior when I find the splendor of God.
I feel the obligation of my name. I want to leave my mark. I know I want to meliorate each place that I stand and I want to make a marked improvement because of my presence. I know I don’t want to stand around and not mark the moment when the radiance of revelation occurred. And I don’t want people to walk around me and worry that they are living singular lives without anyone being aware of their existence. I want them to know that I know and that I see and that I care. And even if we are the only two who saw - we weren’t alone when we shared a remarkable moment.
I have stood and watched the horror of humanity and darted my eyes to see if anyone saw the scene. And I’ve had the moments when no one saw but me. And in those moments I understood the obligation of enlightenment and the hollowness of being alone. And I’ve had the moments when my eyes met their match. And in those moments I remembered the synchronicity of Divinity. I knew I was a member of a community. And I remembered that being a witness didn’t always mean you had to see things you had to bear alone.
This blog evolved into a rumination of my life and my faith. It’s a confession of my faults and my failings. It’s a chronicle of my incidents that provided my insights. I had intended to use this blog for lighthearted musings and amusing asides. And I had intended to offer insights and examples of the management of diabetes. I’ve provided that. I don’t want to risk repetition. And I don’t want to become topical and cull from the surface. I want to illuminate, not excavate. Yes, there are treasures that exist beneath the layers of the sand but there are also shards of glass. I’ve no intention of slashing my hands to unearth something someone dropped. True treasures are buried not abandoned.
When I began this blog I wrote, “Sometimes it’s nice just to coast.” But I don’t want to coast through my life. A coast is a shore that the waves splash and recede. I want to swim and bathe and drink. A wise man builds his house upon the rock and the foolish man builds his house upon the sand. But He didn’t say we couldn’t live on the rock and travel to the sea and dip our tongues in the water. I’ve such a thirst and He’s provided such a well.
I spent Mother’s Day with my Mother. I learned everything of life at her side. We spoke today about her loss of hearing and I thought, “Oh God, the only person who listened soon won’t hear.” And I wailed inside at the loss. It’s a sorrow I do not know I can endure. And then I thought it over and I considered the selfishness of my response. And then I considered that I could still listen and I could still hear. And perhaps it isn’t my turn to talk anymore.
May 13, 2007