Ok I’m thinking there are three types of men in this world:

► The Frank Sinatra “My Way”

► The Elvis Presley “My Way”

► The Paul Anka “My Way”

I started to explain the distinctions of the three and then I realized it’s obvious. And I know I can’t actually authoritatively assert that these three types of men include all male inhabitants on this planet because I know that the majority of males on the earth haven’t any clue who these three men are/were/could have been. Yet I believe some male behaviors and characteristics are inherent and not culturally acquired and these three variations are indicative of all male attitudes. And then I realized I can authoritatively assert that these are in fact the three types of men because I’m the author of this blog and I can assert arguments and asides that are asinine or acidic or anything else that I ascertain. You see, I intend to write this blog my way.

Now I’m certain there is a right way and a wrong way for me to say this. And I don’t intend to suggest this was some sort of a sociological observation of the attributes of masculinity. Well, I won’t for a number of reasons:

1. I hate sociology. I didn’t like it in college and my attitude hasn’t changed. Well, the class itself wasn’t so bad. I sat next to the one of the 10 best looking women I’ve ever actually seen and I can’t recall her name. It was Tracy or Stephanie. Hell I don’t remember. I know her name started with a letter. I don’t recall just eliciting a sound to greet her each class. And drool doesn’t prevent someone from forming letters. Babies teethe and still retain their ability to produce vowel sounds. Wow - I can’t believe I don’t remember her name. It’s as incredible to me as many of the sociological concepts I studied. Although I do recall the professor’s name and I thought he was a horse’s ass.

2. Societal observation carries the implication that I must remove myself from my place in the social group (which to remove myself from the group “males” requires a knife or something and frankly I enjoy this blog but that’s just asking too goddamned much) and it implies elevation for this observation which means helicopters and/or air travel, or some sort of a large scaled ant farm. And we know I’m disinterested in those. Besides, I always tend to fly by the seat of my pants. It’s cheaper than most airlines. And I’m willing to wager that American males are unwilling to slide under a microscope or crawl between two sheets of glass framed by wood. So all my observations were based on personal history, interpersonal communications, and pure all-American conjecture.

3. There exists somewhere a version of “My Way” by The Ray Conniff Singers and I refuse to include it even in the pursuit of exhaustive research. Those who are not scientists are well versed in half-assed research and feel quite content with their mediocrity. And although the Ray Conniff Singers were expert and acclaimed for their pursuit of the mediocre - I just don’t feel I must suffer that much for my scientific pursuits. And I know you’re reading this and thinking “But Mark - the Frank Sinatra version is a finger snapper and I’m fairly certain if anyone actually saw the Ray Conniff Singers perform … the group sang and swayed and snapped. And of course my reply must be to mumble “Ok” and shrug my shoulders and go on my way.

And I contend that anyone who would justify any performer who sang and wore polyester slacks and sweaters and finger snapped and shoulder swayed falls into the Paul Anka category and probably has his greatest hits 8-track in their attic. And I say God bless ‘um; this is America. But please stay out of my way.

 

April 13, 2007

I recently attended a party and a conversation occurred that exemplified an aspect of masculinity I find particularly abhorrent. Two buddies were engaged in a conversation that was playful in manner but brutal in intent. It’s the kind of conversation that occurs when women are around and male pride is apparent. Now, the two men seemed the best of friends. As the jest progressed, a joust arose. And one of the men revealed an incident that the other man had confided. The incident was not intimate; it was private and should not have been made public.

While his words slurred from his lips, my heart fell to my feet. I’ve been the man who stood by while a compatriot shattered my confidence. And I’ve been the man who stood near and shattered my companion by my combat. And I’ve been the man who stood around and watched the shattering of companionship and cloaked myself in objective complacence.

Society deems boxing as barbaric but the trading of barbs as burlesque. The man who slays the compeer in competition is considered razor-sharp, a cut up, a cut above the rest, and on the cutting edge. Hooray. So what was sheared? Who’s left in shards? And how is the victim to sit now that he’s been castrated in the name of comedic conquest?

Remember that a bosom buddy doesn’t mean his heart is close so you’ll have little difficulty sliding in your saber. And a comrade in arms doesn’t mean you’re required to keep him at arms length nor does it mean you should arm yourself with amiable ammunition that allows you to abuse and affront, but it does suggest that you greet him with open arms in the name of the fraternity of humanity.

A battle of the wits is exactly what it is: a battle. At the dawn, the only spoils of war will be the decayed friendship that will not endure. And while you raise your head and glance in the mirror with the razor in your hands, water in the sink, cream on your cheeks, and shame on your soul, as you avoid your own gaze … remember how sharp that razor really is.

And on the day when the dawn seems dusk and you need a friend because you’re at your wits’ end, regrets will be more plentiful than people and pals will be as absent as empathy. You won’t give one wit whether you’ve won that battle or not. You’ll have lost the war. And your legacy will not be a litany of the laudable. It will be a list of your casualties: a list of the wounded by your casual yet caustic comedy.

April 28, 2007

You know, sometimes I’m stunned. Sometimes I’m taken aback and I can’t find the words of response or I can’t grasp the conceit of others. And I restrain and I ruminate. Sometimes the answers seem elusive and sometimes I think they’ll evade me. Yet I’m persistent and I’m cocky and I know I will solve the puzzle. So I chew it around for a while with the confidence of arriving at the solution. And eventually clarity creeps into my consciousness. I always know what occurred. And I always know why it occurred. Sometimes I know when it will occur. So I question the propriety of my response and the morality of my motivation.

Twice this week I was insulted. And twice this week I offered no response. And twice this week I offered no defense. It’s not that my feelings were hurt. I was stunned by the audacity. I was misjudged as more friend and less foe. That was their misstep. I assumed a more acute assessment. That was my miscalculation. Obviously I afforded them a disproportionate degree of wisdom and they afforded me a disproportionate degree of tolerance. Either way I was unprepared for their perpetrations. I won’t make that mistake again.

And it’s not that I couldn’t respond. Although I’m 6′2 and just shy of 200 lbs, I’m quite nimble of tongue, more than articulate, and deft at debate. Verbal rebuttal is rarely reluctant and is only hampered by a mind that shifts more swiftly than a tongue can tackle. So I hesitate to resort to a retort. I take the moment to remember where I am and what responsibility my response will weigh in the environment. If it ain’t my party, I rarely partake. I sparingly spar but I decimate decisively. If I wasn’t adept at an assail, I wouldn’t have to pursue prudence and I wouldn’t thirst for temperance.

I walked off the elevator on Tuesday and I encountered a man I dislike. No, I don’t hate him. I don’t care enough about him to offer him that much consideration. He’s a jealous man who slays with a glance and stabs with a grimace. Although I’m merely cordial to him and I’ve never actually touched the toe to the line of friendly, I’ve never ignored his presence nor have I been less than kind. We have mutual friends and that ripens the situation with complications. I greeted him with pleasantries on our first encounter Tuesday. I sucked it up for my buddy.

So when I encountered him for the second time on Tuesday, I was unprepared for his attack. He insulted me in front of others. Cowardice deems it necessary to insulate inside a crowd. A man looks into the eyes of his opponent and confronts by way of an affront: eye to eye and tooth to tooth and limb toward limb. Now, believe me - I’ve a vicious tongue. I have no trouble and even less trepidation telling a man what he is and what he is not and where he can go to acquire his necessities. And I have the kind of pride that is less lionhearted and more carnivorous. But I also have a conscience. So I tend to pray for my prey and chew my cheek as I turn it instead of gnawing at an enemy’s underbelly. So I said nothing. It’s not that I took the moral high ground; I’m a loyal friend. I bit my tongue and I swallowed my pride. The poor bastard misinterpreted my act of tolerance as an act of weakness. He thought I was weak-kneed. I could have brought him to his knees. I’m not angry with him for his offensive behavior. I’m angry with myself for questioning my behavior. I deliberated on whether or not I’ve become too kind. Jesus Christ, who can be too kind?

The second offense occurred while I waited in the cafeteria. I was engaged in a conversation with a man who enjoys the insolent and embraces the insult. I’ve allowed his actions because I knew there was intelligence behind his badgering. I hoped there was a heart behind the hostility. And I thought he possessed the mettle to settle into conversation and away from competition. Tuesday he threw his jabs that I dodged and then he turned to me and sneered, “Don’t you ever do anything you’re not supposed to do?” He said it like I’d been caught slapping the feeble. I held him in regard so I had let down my guard. I was caught off guard. I was unprepared and I stumbled over a response.

For an instant I felt ashamed. And for an instant I felt inadequate. And for an instant I felt humiliated that my answer had to be: “No. I don’t. I always try to do what I’m supposed to do.” For an instant I felt like such a jackass. And for the first time in my life I felt embarrassed that I tried to be a decent human being. I started to retaliate but I hesitated and I remembered that he was my friend and that I liked him. And I remembered that you can’t judge a man by one sentence. Many times I’ve said the wrong thing at the wrong time with little motivation. So I sucked it up for my buddy. Yet my gullet has been engulfed and I’ve taken more than I’m willing to swallow. I’m a man, not a vacuum.

You know, it’s ironic he would ask me that question in a hospital. The rooms of a hospital are littered with the remnants of people who did not do what they were supposed to do. You can meander into any room and find someone in a bed or near the rail or on a table or in a chair and see the effects of someone not doing what he was supposed to do. Whether it be the obese who didn’t wane or the drunk who didn’t abstain or the contagious who didn’t contain or the smoker who didn’t refrain, they all suffer the consequences of their behavior. Even accident victims suffer the consequences of someone somewhere not doing what he was supposed to do.

I think there has to be a pursuit in life that is higher than a paycheck, a payback, or a piece of ass. Surely there is more to attain than that. What happened to honor or nobility or loyalty? Those are the passions of my pursuits. And if it makes me odd or unique to aspire to something outside my pocket, or beyond my wrist or above my waist, then I’ll carry the mantle alone. I’ve never given a rat’s ass whether or not I was liked. I have cared whether or not I was alike. But, that was then. I don’t anymore. I’ll turn my cheek when my conscience requires it. And I’ll turn my back when my face is too swollen to locate my teeth.

It’s funny that no one ever considers that a cheek can turn to offer the other side or the backside. Turn about is fair play and sometimes it’s about keeping face to make an about face. And sometimes you have to save your buddy’s face by putting your fist in your pocket and giving him the treat of your retreat.

And I’ll do all that. But I won’t compromise. I know what I am. I know what I am not. I am a human being who deserves to be treated with dignity and honored for my humanity. I am not the punchline to a poke from a prick who feels threatened by my presence. I am required to bow before my God. I am not required to grab my ankles before any man. I know the merits of righteousness outweigh the benefits of fellowship.

I’m not that kind of a man and I’m not that loyal of a friend. I have one mouth, two fists, two sets of cheeks, and two testicles. I’m not required to offer them in barter to any man for compensation, camaraderie, retaliation, or retribution. And I still have two feet that I’ll plant and I will not be moved. By God when I leave this earth, I’ll at least know that I didn’t waste my space and I wasn’t content to be remembered as a wallet, a fist, and a dick.

 

June 8, 2007

One of the most astonishing aspects of the synchronicity of Divinity is that once you’re aware of its existence you become aware of its presence. And I’m not referring to some weird-assed new age crap. I’m speaking of good ol’ tried and true Divine Providence. This week I learned an answer to a question that’s troubled me for years. No. Hell - it’s disturbed me for decades.

I’ve spent a life wondering why I cared so much when others never seemed to care at all. I used to wonder why my character was so flawed. I thought there was an element of masculinity that I had missed. I’ve felt less a man and more a fool. I’ve seen beauty that’s left me breathless. I’ve felt sorrow that’s left me speechless. I’ve felt happiness that’s kept me hopeful. I’ve felt loneliness that’s left me at a loss for words and teeming with tears. I’ve felt a faith that’s filled me with fortitude and enabled me to endure. And yet I’ve remained amazed that few men have shared the fact that they’ve shared those feelings.

So when I’ve offered sympathy to the apathetic or an open hand to the fisted, I’ve met their indifference with bewilderment. Why didn’t they care? Why didn’t they inquire? I’ve stood in the middle of a group of mates and was told, “Mark no one gives a fuck about that” and I said nothing. I’ve stood and offered no response to, “Oh who cares?” while I silently thought “me. I care.” I hadn’t considered that I couldn’t assimilate into a group of asses. I just knew I didn’t always fit. As I aged, I answered aloud. Yet I’ve remained perplexed. Well, until this week.

This week I’ve learned this lesson: I’m not flawed; I’m tenacious. When others didn’t inquire, I didn’t emulate. I inquired. While others were careless, I cared. I still care. I care that you care. I care when I don’t care enough. I care when you don’t care enough. I want to care enough to have the passion to carry on.

Yet when I have a problem, I don’t carry on and on about it to my friends. This may come as a surprise to anyone who’s read any of these expositions, but I’m a very private man. I rarely write about current relationships and I do not write about the daily doings of my life. My intent is to write about the incidents that provide me with a greater understanding of the fragility of humanity and the splendor of Divinity. Lately my life is a constant state of stress. It is because I’m human and I’m middle-aged. Every human being has these moments and as we age they accelerate. It’s called life.

I don’t discuss the details of my daily distresses with anyone. Why would I? They aren’t unique enough to require edification and they aren’t serious enough to warrant fraternal worry. So I trudge along. I’m not afraid or apprehensive about their disclosure. I’m cognizant that everyone is under stress and I understand that I do not require assistance enough that I’m justified in bothering my buddies with my woes for their burden. I’m not embarrassed by tribulation. I just think it’s somewhat selfish to offer a fellow human being your turbulence.

The first incident that provided clarity began a couple of weeks ago. I had a moment or two when I became overwhelmed and I confided in one of my closest buddies. He listened. I fussed and then I fortified. This week when we caught up again he didn’t ask me about my situations. I was slightly taken aback but then I backed up and looked in his eyes and I was aware that he didn’t care. He has his own worries. And we discussed the things that concerned him. For a moment I wondered why he didn’t ask me of my worries and I questioned myself for seeing the discrepancy. I judged myself selfish and I judged my reaction as egocentric.

The second incident that provided clarity began a while ago. For the past couple of years I became professionally acquainted with a man. We nodded and traded names but we never moved past that point toward friendship. We’d pass each other. We acknowledged the other’s presence. We sometimes said hello. We were cordial but not companions. The last time I met his acquaintance I took the time to talk. We exchanged a conversation that had little meaning yet held more kindness. I thought it was inconsequential and I offered the conversation neither credence nor consideration.

This week we encountered again. I inquired about the outcome of an incident and he informed me of the consequences of the event. And then he dropped the artifice and he looked me in the eyes and he said, “Hey thanks for the interest.” And I was stunned. This is a man in the middle of a challenging and celebrated career. He’s personable, polished, and praised. Why was he surprised someone inquired? And then I realized that although I had offered our previous conversation low importance, he had not. I cared but I wasn’t concerned enough to be careful. But he cared and when he looked into my eyes - he knew I cared too. And then he realized he didn’t have to be careful.

I considered the two incidents and I saw parallelism in the partnership. I saw the dichotomy between the one who surprised me because he wasn’t interested and the one who was surprised that someone was interested. I’m not in the position to judge whether it is in one’s best interest to remain disinterested. I know I am incapable of doing that even when it’s in my best self-interests.

I asked a friend of mine the other day whether or not we wanted to live lives without worry. And I just typed the word worry. I’m not confused and should have typed the word anxiety. Anxiety is a disproportionate amount of worry that is worrisome because it’s based on a selfish reaction to a lack of action. I’m defining worry as caring enough about other people to be concerned about the consequences of their incidents and their actions. I won’t reveal her response. Those are her words to share. I said that I wanted to live a life that was concerned with the concerns of others.

And so I take emotional risks because what are we actually risking? I asked someone that recently and she astutely replied, “rejection.” That’s very true but I think we’re risking pride too. I try to not allow my pride to prevent me from providing companionship to people. I feel foolish sending a birthday card or any greeting card but I remember how fondly I feel for the fellow or how grateful I feel for his kindness and I can’t allow myself to deny a just action because I fear an adverse reaction. So I place calls to the ones I call my friends. And I write emails that inquire and I try to inspire. I ask questions that probe their problems but aren’t a violation of their privacy. I try to share people’s concerns even when they don’t concern me.

As I type this I feel as if I’m implying I am a prying type of man. I am not. I don’t feel the need to be apart of everyone’s life. I just don’t want anyone to feel they are a part from anyone’s life. And I try not to be suspicious of the motivation of other’s conversations. The sheer joy of the synchronicity of Divinity is that God aligns many parts to make a unified whole. And it’s our fragility that makes us wholly human. And it’s His generous providence that makes Him holy Divine.

 

July 13, 2007

I ran into an acquaintance the other morning and he wasn’t wearing his glasses. I said, “Ok. Contacts? Lasik? Lazy? I can’t keep track.” And Brian laughed and laughed. The rest of the conversation was rote so it won’t be wrote but he did say, “I can’t believe you noticed that!” The man was stunned.

And why wouldn’t I have noticed it? I notice everything. It’s not because I covet the components so I can make them my own. And it’s not because I scour the scene to scold and scoff. I notice everything because I care. I genuinely care. I don’t sit in observance. I participate. Sure, I study my surroundings for lessons. But that sounds more clinical than it is. I study things because I think human nature and human behavior are consistently fascinating.

Here’s my observation from yesterday: it was a marvelous summer day so I spent the majority of my time outside. I saw a couple at the park. They were in their mid-thirties. They didn’t match each other but they were typical of unmatched couples I often see. Oh you know the pair. He’s too thin, sports a beard, and looks like he just threw a pot on a wheel. She’s meatier, pleasant yet plain, and looks like she played the oboe in the high school band. Both are attractive yet their appearances do not compliment each other. They walked side by side yet several steps aside. Her arms hung at her waist. His hands held his hips. And if that stance isn’t cumbersome as it is … he had his hands backwards so that his thumbs faced forward.

I have never stood in that position. Ok - maybe I did as a kid while playing superman with a towel safety-pinned around my throat, but this man had no cape. He looked more posed than postured. I have seen women position themselves in that pose. However they’re always at the start of a race and preparing by bending at the waist. Well, the stance seems affected so I stood and I adopted the pose to form my moral position. Ok. I think it’s feigned. It’s unnatural and forced.

Now I think a man should model himself after a mentor. I think all men must take a stand. And I think all men must adopt a stance on every instance. Hell, I’ll even give a guy the thumbs up for facing things and possessing forward thinking. And although it may seem hypocritical or even hip-o-critical (or would it be hypercritical,) I categorically refute any motion of a man putting his hands on his hips. It’s too mannered. Well, unless he’s going to launch into an ethnic dance or touch his toes. Besides these two times, it’s just asinine. I don’t wish to step on anyone’s toes, but I will thumb my nose at the exercise because his thumbs must be pointed toward his backside. His thumbs should be pointing out the obvious.

August 13, 2007

I’ve known Gary for a couple of years. We started out as casual acquaintances. I’d say hello and he’d nod. We moved to pleasantries and soon we started to chat: simple, casual, caustic-free chat. We had little in common but the big things. We shared a belief. We shared the same sight. We never discussed it. Yet it was our foundation. We shared a fraternity.

I found myself sharing the details of my life. I rarely do that. I’m rarely comfortable doing that. He’d listen; I talked. That’s rare. He’d talk; I listened. He had no bitterness in his banter. That’s rare. We shared many laughs: simple, casual, caustic-free laughs.

Soon I’d look for him. I noticed his absence. “Where the hell have you been?” I’d say. He looked for me. He noticed mine. “Hey you were gone” he’d accuse. We’d inquire but not probe. “How are you?” he’d ask. “Things ok with you?” I’d ask. We had a camaraderie: simple, casual, caustic-free caring. Emails passed. Introductions exchanged. Pictures shared. Invitations offered. Friendship attained.

A week went by. I thought “vacation.” Two weeks went by. I thought, “Damn. Long vacation.” Three weeks went by. I grew concerned so I inquired. From now on he’ll just be absent.  The finality of death is a conclusion that’s easier to face than geographical or emotional migration. You know they won’t come back. That’s the constant you grasp. Your emotions may vacillate but that fact remains like a broken tooth your tongue snags as you speak or swallow. They’re dead; they are not coming back.

Yet sometimes things just change. One day your son doesn’t stop by anymore. One day she decides she doesn’t want to be married anymore. One day they decide that employee isn’t needed anymore. One day he’s offered a different job in a different city. And then they’re gone. And there’s nothing you can do. And your life changed. Somehow something you counted on concluded. Something changed without your consent. Someone left without your concurrence. It’s an unfinished finale. It’s sex without the cigarette. It’s a day-to-day death without the deceased.

I’m devastated I won’t see my friend anymore. I haven’t felt this brokenhearted since my best friend from college died 20 years ago. I spent a restless night in bed contemplating why I cared so goddamned much over someone I didn’t realize I cared so goddamned much about. I didn’t realize how much I counted on our casual.

Our friendship was too casual to pursue yet too unique to forget. I don’t have casual in my life. I’ve been accused of courting drama for the sake of the drama. And that’s simply untrue. If I wanted to be amidst the play – I wouldn’t have chosen a seat in the balcony. I write of my observations more than of my participations. I chose a solitary profession. I like the solitude. I just wasn’t aware of the fact that I loved the casual. Until it casually walked away.

 

August 24, 2007

I often tell people that they can find my blog by putting my name into Google. I always say, “It’s Trost. Trust with an O.” And although I’m considered trustworthy, I’ve noticed the irony that I’m not particularly trusting of my fellow man. Perhaps that’s why I’m intensively private. And perhaps that’s why I’m aware when others are so trustful.

I observed complete vulnerability this week. Two separate men during two separate conversations said sentences of such shocking truth and vulnerability to me that I shuddered with fear on their behalf. They weren’t acts of self-abasement. They were actions of complete disclosure of their souls.

I shuddered in remembrance that men are truly carnivorous. I’ve watched men gnaw at the pride and the dignity of their competitors. I’ve shared that gluttonous feast on so many occasions that it’s a wonder I can type with hands that should stifle my burps.

Yet today I contemplated why these two men were so willing to offer absolute exposition. And then I realized that they trusted me. They trusted that I wouldn’t laugh at them. They trusted that I wouldn’t belittle them. They trusted that I wouldn’t stockpile their limitations for amusing ammunition that I could employ and deploy against them. And although neither of these men could consider me a friend, I contemplated any responsibility that I had to advise them against future exposition, but I couldn’t justify advising anyone against sharing his humanity with his fellow men.

I’m a writer. I know that my recapitulation of their revelations would make for a more interesting read. But I couldn’t live with myself if I offered their marrow for my musings. They gave me a generous gift. I’ve never given that much of myself to anyone. I’m not that good of a man.

 

August 30, 2007

Next Page »